Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. " Then it was assigned to an Editorial Assistant (EA) for admin check. See also this question: Manuscript status changed from “Reviews completed” to “Editor assigned”. Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision Oct 30, 2023 · After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". There is no oracle for such things. Let’s take them one by one. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Editorial Office Assessment. The status, "Awaiting ED decision" most likely indicates that the manuscript is with the journal editor (likely editor-in-chief) for final checks before you receive the verdict. Don't make assumptions. I am not 6 days ago · SCI投稿25天，还在Awaiting Reviewer selection是不是该催稿或者撤稿啊？. 论文从接收到意见变为审稿状态. Post Markup: Nov 5, 2019 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. Your manuscript might be at the end of a pretty long queue that might take time. Share. This can mean that the Editor in Chief is deliberating over who should review your file. This could be because the original AE declined the assignment, resigned from the editorial board, is too busy to make a decision, and so on. Answer: Thank you for your question. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. These status should not be taken seriously. Odds are this means the AE changed. TIE投稿三审状态从awaiting AE decision退回到Under review了。. It may include for example: Checking for missing or broken files. Apr 12, 2016 · Dear Editage Insights team, I submitted my article 3 months ago to a journal. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. This can vary in form. Sociologist 95d. Mar 28, 2020 · So, ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ means the associate editor (AE) is awaiting the peer reviewer’s comments and evaluation of the paper. " Once the EA started checking the manuscript, the status changed to "Awaiting ED Assignment. （1）Editor in Chief（EIC），贼重， 发挟下硅官，妇勿喊鞍参哲汹狠。. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. , line numbers, if required by the journal. – Buffy. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Jun 27, 2018 · Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. Aug 8, 2020 · The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any response from them. If the status still does not change, you can send an email to the Editor-in Apr 1, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Edit the user’s account to list them as an ‘Excluded Reviewer’ so that their names don’t pull into your results. Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. This is probably a duplicate, but I won't mark it as such since my vote would be definitive. It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". It may be as simple as making the author and reviewers known to one another, or the reviews – and the reviewers’ names – may be published alongside the article. There is no set time for this to take. Oct 31, 2017 · Initially, once your paper was submitted, the status showed "Admin not assigned. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. , "Awaiting AE decision". Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. It will wait until a predetermined condition (so Jun 15, 2020 · Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ This status is known by different names with different journals, including ‘Under review’ and ‘Awaiting technical scores. This step is usually performed by the journal's administrative staff. Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Apr 23, 2020 · Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. I didnt see the "under review May 11, 2021 · The manuscript status was changing back to “Under Review” perhaps due to one of following reasons: Some of the reviewers that initially accepted to review the manuscript have now declined to review it due to their unavailability. It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. answered Mar 29, 2018 at 7:04. This page is also available within the submission by clicking the “Manuscript Information” tab. '. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Improve this answer. The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal via Scholar-One Manuscripts. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review (s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. This is when the status changed to "EA: [name]. One of the steps available (and being used here) is batching and sending of the manuscript to the journals production service. Answer: These are relatively simple. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. Open peer review. When the search results appear, select “View Details” in the “Take Action” drop down menu. The R-Score is the average score a reviewer receives from editors. 2. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review The reviewer will automatically appear in the Reviewer List; Flag inactive reviewers. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 1 year ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply. Oct 12, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question. The term "Accept" means that your manuscript has Aug 12, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" In general, in the context of the process of publishing in scientific journals, the phrase “wait for the results of the review after review” refers to the period it takes for the research to Page 3 of 7. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? Mar 22, 2021 · Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Search for the manuscript by ID, title, or author name using the Quick Search feature. Therefore, new reviewers are being invited. Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. CommentedFeb 17, 2021 at 13:42. If the reviewers respond that they will review your manuscript, the status will change to "Under Review". " Aug 31, 2017 · We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. So, please give me advice. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". You can check the acceptance percentage Jan 19, 2021 · Q: What does it mean if the status has been 'Awaiting EIC Decision' for the past 20 days? Detailed Question - After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Reject:The paper has been through the peer review process and PNAS averages 10 days from submission to initial decision, 45 days from submission to decide on a full review, and 6. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Oct 6, 2021 · 1 Answer to this question. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around . It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. If you don’t see any change in the status for a few weeks, you could write to the journal, requesting for an update on the status of your submission. （祷吃遵章歧突储怕）. This means that the manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review has likely been completed, and now the journal is awaiting the final scores from the reviewer/s. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. g. （3）Associated Editor（AE） 雕伪引，漠粉卧担固古，冈设扶愉鄙洗（reviewers Aug 13, 2015 · Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. This is, however, a highly selective Nov 27, 2016 · Depending on the journal, two weeks isn't really a long time for editor assignment. " Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. " This status has not been changed for a month. 肃磷锉窗判米撰毒：. Apr 21, 2020 · Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. Feb 27, 2021 · Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Going by that assumption, the status of your first manuscript "ED: Not Assigned, GE: Not Assigned, Awaiting JM Checklist" means that no action has yet been taken on your paper. Once accepted, some journals have a set of tasks that a manuscript goes through. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the Nov 16, 2015 · A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. 论文 Mar 24, 2022 · An innovative big data framework for exploring the impact on decision-making in the European Mediterranean healthcare sector - Author: Mahmoud El Samad, Sam El Nemar, Georgia Sakka, Hani El-Chaarani At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). ’ What this means is that your manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review comments/opinions are presently awaited. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. You could be recognised for your efforts; each year editors are asked to nominate outstanding reviewers for our Literati Awards. When the current Editors Initial Check. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. 投TIE， 状态变为 Awaiting AE decision 一个月了. The status of the paper changed several times. May 25, 2020 · Hello Jyotirmayee – welcome to the forum! To get right into it, your (seniors’) understanding of the ‘Awaiting EiC Decision’ in ScholarOne's Manuscript Central (called ‘Decision in Process’ in some other systems) is correct to some extent. Checking central formatting requirements, e. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Therefore, the Assigned Editor (AE) has now sent the manuscript back for peer review with a new set of reviewers. ’ 知乎专栏提供一个自由表达和随心写作的平台。 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At this stage, the Associate Editor should invite reviewers to evaluate the article, from those chosen in the previous step. Three weeks ago, in the ScholarOne system, it showed "Awaiting final decision". If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Answer: Thank you for your question! The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. However, it is the responsibility of the Editor-in-Chief to deal with such delays. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. It means nothing. Dec 7, 2021 · Based on the information you have provided, 6 months have passed and no peer reviewer has been assigned to review the file. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. This access is valid for a 90 day period from when you receive your access notification. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Indicates that invitations have already been sent to reviewers but that reviewers have not yet responded. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. Oct 18, 2023 · john tizzile. Others might, however. If the paper is to be rejected at this point, a rejection letter is sent out and the file is closed. Give every review an R-Score. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript Sep 19, 2016 · Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Sep 12, 2022 · Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. The final decision - whether to accept or reject the paper - depends on the reviewer scores, which is why the status of your manuscript would All Answers (5) 'Awaiting decision' means the required reviews to make a decision were completed. That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment Jul 10, 2024 · Review and selection of manuscripts. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. For now, you only need to wait. If there is a refusal on the invitations, the Aug 19, 2021 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Feb 9, 2020 · ‘Awaiting Editorial Office Processing’ means that the manuscript was awaiting an Editorial Office (EO) or Associate Editor (AE) check for aspects such as adherence to guidelines, match with the journal’s scope, and novelty of the study. Feb 17, 2021 · 1. In my opinion, ED in ScholarOne refers to Editor and GE refers to Guest Editor. I'm not sure what JM checklist refers to, but my guess is that Dec 28, 2020 · First, congratulations!! "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" is part of the accepted workflow. Jan 3, 2023 · 1 Answer to this question. (The journal I submitted to allows it to be reprinted by SCI朱壕席镶. Jun 12, 2020 · What does the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores' without assigning GE mean? A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural form) recommendations. The review process may take place pre- or post-publication, and reports may receive their own DOIs, making them discoverable and citable. After this step, you're likely to receive a decision of acceptance with major/minor revisions (fingers Nov 12, 2018 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. Submission of Paper. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Scores This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. 去年11月，我在老师的建议下投了一篇TMECH的文章，中间经过漫长的审稿、拒稿/大修，改稿、润色，最后到今天把大修的论文 Sep 15, 2021 · The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. – Jon Custer. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. This decision may normally take up to 2 weeks . But the editor has sent your manuscript to another reviewer that's why it's again "awaiting 期刊是Environmental Microbiology的论文重投后，为什么一直在等待审稿人选择？知乎上有相关经验和解答，快来看看吧。 Nov 5, 2019 · The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). As you've mentioned, you have addressed the previous reviewer's concerns, so the EIC may suggest moving the manuscript to peer Reviewing for an Emerald journal entitles you to free personal access to up 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding backfiles). Feb 21, 2019 · 2. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. （2）ADM- (唤竟溜) Administrator 伍运凑刷乓缓回掠肤催靴阔。. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the Apr 21, 2020 · You have three queries. Anything is possible. We would recommend waiting for at least 2-3 more weeks. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review:The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers T horax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year. Checking compliance with length requirements, if any. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Should I Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. The status also means that the paper has been sent to the minimal number of peer reviewers required by the journal (it being 2-3 for most journals). Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript Jul 4, 2020 · I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. Aug 9, 2022 · I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. 1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review. 6. All submissions will first be subject to an in-house evaluation process with respect to suitability for BLC in terms of quality, content and methodology. Sep 18, 2020 · For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. What is the meaning of "Awaiting Referee Scores" after revision ? I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. A plagiarism check. May 6, 2021 · Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. But it could also have other outcomes, including requesting revision. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. "Awaiting EIC decision" means that the journal is waiting on a decision by the "Editor in Chief". This change has occurred EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. The Editorial Office checks the paper’s composition and arrangement against the journal’s Author Guidelines to make sure it includes the required sections and stylizations. Nov 1, 2019 · The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. For minor revisions, some editors might make a decision on their own, but they can send it out for peer review if they feel the need to. Yes, it could be rejected. 3. Nov 21, 2016 · Four months seems unreasonable. The editor in chief may not just 'accept' or 'reject' the manuscript. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Sep 20, 2017 · 1. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. Answer: It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. 1. This may involve checking that the submission is within the journal's scope and adheres to submission guidelines. Jul 31, 2021 · They may have reached out to potential reviewers and may be awaiting a response. Aug 31, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. May 1, 2021 · 1 Answer to this question. t backed up) waiting to be sent to some reviews. Nov 21, 2022 · The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Feb 15, 2023 · I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Another point to note is that ScholarOne is not always up-to-date with the process of the publisher. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Moreover, getting the right editor for your topic is also sometimes an issue. e. " At this stage, the EA goes through the paper and Feb 18, 2023 · The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). Mar 29, 2018 · 0. Foxing. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. Either the AE is on leave or having a holiday trip with family or health issues. Possible reasons for the need of a new reviewer could be that the initial reviewer is busy with some other personal or professional commitment and has stepped back from the review. This change has occurred Mar 28, 2015 · AE stands for "Associate Editor. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". 从under review到Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation一般要多久. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? Mar 16, 2022 · Answer: Dear Author, Thank you for your question. Has anyone had this experience Mar 9, 2017 · @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Jul 1, 2017 · A reviewer refused to review the manuscript after some days (this is a very rare case), so the editor will send the manuscript to a new potential reviewer. Answer: It is not uncommon for a journal to invite new reviewers after a manuscript has been submitted with minor revisions. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". After one week, I wrote to the Managing Editor enquiring about the status of my article, and he told me that he had received the needed reviews, and he is only waiting for the word of the Editor-in-Chief before he communicates the final Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. 4 months from submission to publication. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". cr qm kf hq gp de dk zu ad pc